Tentative conclusions and ways forward 1
What do these responses tell us?
Byzantium seems to be preferred to EQL-UMA
- But why? Package quality / appropriateness / integration
Lectures are liked, for non calculative learning
Books not particularly liked - but books are least replaceable!
Different methods are preferred for different learning: BUT no consensus on what is supportive or replaceable
The integration - seems to be a success
- At least perceived "gaps" are filled by LT
- BUT care needed due to dynamic here
Eclectic students and mix of learning styles / learning preferences
- Perhaps LT's main benefit is to provide alternatives?