Pilot Engineering Repository Xsearch |
![]() |
Investigating resource discovery issues in engineering digital repositories | | Home | About | Deliverables | Links | Pilot | |
Pilot Service EnhancementsM.Moffat (M.Moffat@hw.ac.uk) 11/05/07 Contents
|
Agreed Enhancements |
Implemented? |
1. Additional Content A range of additional sources were successfully added to enhanced cross search including: Copac (via SRU), Emerald Engineering, Google, GRADE, Institution of Civil Engineers (ICE) Virtual Library, Open Video Project, Oxford Journals, The Structural Engineer Archive. A range of other sources were investigate but for various reasons could not be successfully included (e.g. National Archive of Geological Photographs, OSTI, Public STINET, Information Bridge) |
Yes |
2. Full Text Availability Indicators To help provide an indication of the likely availability of resources, all collections cross-searched by the pilot were given Full Text Availability Indicators. These indicators use a ‘traffic light' metaphor to attempt to categorise the resource availability of included collections. |
Yes |
3. SRU Functionality Established SRU (Search/Retrieve via URL) is a search protocol for querying databases over the internet and returning search results. SRW (Search/Retrieve Web Service is a closely related protocol. PerX has implemented both a SRU/W client and a SRU server. The PerX SRU/W client allows SRU/W targets to be incorporated into the cross search service. Targets currently cross searched via SRU/W include COPAC and Inderscience. The PerX SRU Server allows other services to conduct SRU searches on any of collections cross searched via PerX [details]. |
Yes |
4. Improved Advanced Search The advanced search was improved to provide a category list of collections as well as the default alphabetical list. The look and feed was modified to make the advanced search more similar to Google. |
Yes |
5. Default Search modified to 'ALL' As suggested by end users the default PerX search was modified to search 'All' resources rather than forcing users to choose a particular 'category' of resource to search. |
Yes |
6. Remove Collections with Zero hits from Results As suggested by end users databases returning zero hits were removed from the results list. |
Yes |
7. Refine Search Offer means for refining original search results. |
No |
8. Records Selection Add functionality to enable users to save search results in formats suitable for reuse. |
No |
9. Support Google Type Syntax |
No |
A number of possible enhancements were investigated via the PerX focus groups. The ideas which were not taken forward included the following:
Discounted Enhancements |
a. Merging Sets While the merging of results sets from databases and relevance ranking of these merged sets would be a very useful enhancement to the service, in the context of PerX this would be very difficult to implement. For this reason this enhancement was deemed to not to be viable within the project resources and timescales. |
b.
Citation Linking Probably not possible for PerX with current metadata restraints. |
c.
Saved Searches moderate interest expressed via focus groups, high development effort required. |
d.
Visualisation of Search Results Little interest expressed via focus groups |
e.
Geospatial Searching Little interest expressed via focus groups |
f.
Support Spell Check Facilities Little interest expressed via focus groups |
g.
Language Translation Little interest expressed via focus groups |
...resource discovery in engineering | | Home | About | Deliverables | Links | Pilot | |